Foreign sources cited Sandmark ' s analysis that Sui had three stoppages within 36 hours of May 28-29. The incident did not result in the loss of user funds, but the inability of the user to transfer, reposition or use the chain for a time also led to a renewed focus on the short set of stability of the high-performance public chain.

Three stops in 36 hours.

The article notes that Sui has recently received attention for performance and that its design is to process a large number of transactions in parallel to support daily applications such as payments, games and financial instruments. This is why the continued availability of the network is not just a matter of experience, but of the ability of the infrastructure to carry out real business.

Sandmark believes that these three stoppages relate to a recent software update. The first two disruptions resulted from deficiencies in the processing of partial payment transactions on the network, leading to a breakdown of the system. The team then launched the rehabilitation measures, but did not cover a similar problem, and the network was again shut down. The third was triggered by another stand-alone loophole during a conventional system transition.

  • The stop time is focused on 28-29 May.
  • Three interruptions within 36 hours.
  • All the triggers are related to software deficiencies.

Failure to lose funds does not mean limited impact

The article states that Sui ' s failure did not result in a direct loss of the chain ' s assets, but this was the most basic result. For users, offline means that while assets are still on the books, they cannot be moved in a timely manner and cannot enter the application to complete transactions or manage positions.

The impact of such disruptions on payments, derivatives and other high-frequency scenes is particularly evident. If the public chain wishes to take on a broader range of financial activities, only throughput and speed are not sufficient, and sustained and stable operation is also a prerequisite.

It'll take time for reputational restoration.

The article mentioned that Sui had used the chain pledge growth to drive a strong token and was testing the web to launch a platform for forecasting markets and derivatives trading. The successive stoppages at the end of the month contrasted the growth narrative of this phase.

According to external sources, other mainstream public chains have experienced similar failures, and some of the projects have subsequently completed repairs and resumed growth, but network trust often requires longer-term reconstruction. For the encryption industry, the incident again demonstrated that, if the block chain is to become a serious financial infrastructure, reliability must be placed on the same footing as performance.