Bitcoin has been lagging behind in the recent past, and American real bitcoin ETF foreclosure pressure has risen significantly. Citing market data, it was reported that the United States of America had a net outflow of real bitcoin ETF last week of $1.79 billion, the second largest single week since the launch of the product, and that the IBIT under the Beled flag was one of the main sources of outflows.

The IBIT is ahead of the exit scale

The data show that IBIT ' s one-week outflow of approximately $860 million is close to a net outflow of funds for the seventh consecutive week. If this trend continues, it will become the longest rotation since the Fund became operational.

It was also reported that, on 25 June, Belet had transferred 3410 BTCs to Coinbase Prime, approximately $209.6 million at current prices. This was followed by more than 1,000 BTCs coming out of the ETF holdroom, reflecting the fact that investors were still redeeming.

Creditor gains/losses

According to the report, the average IBIT holder was still at about 30 per cent in mid-2025, citing Geraci. However, bitcoin has fallen behind rapidly from a high of $126,000, and this share has been largely wiped out.

According to estimates, the average IBIT investor is now close to 40 per cent in deficit. It also shows that the traditional access to markets through the ETF also suffered significant losses during the current round of adjustments.

Present ETF Total Pressure

In addition to a single fund, the real bitcoin ETF in the United States is under pressure as a whole. The report estimates that the current aggregate unrealized losses for these products are approximately $22.42 billion, with the corresponding average purchase cost of approximately $82,899 per bitcoin.

At the same time, Bitcoin had previously fallen to a low of $58,126 during the year, evaporating the entire encryption market to a market value of $150 billion, and then prices had rebounded, but the return of funds had not recovered significantly.

Based on current data, spot ETFs remain an important window for the needs of observers. Without a re-inflow of additional funds, the pace of market restoration may continue to slow.