When Robinwood Chain went online, discussions around how much real income Ether could get from the Layer 2 network rose again. The chain data show that the network has generated approximately US$ 843,000 in handling fees, but only US$ 1600 is paid for data availability and settlement costs in the Inn.

Broader distribution of costs

Etheum Daily statistically states that the user paid approximately US$ 843,000 for the handling fees on Robinwood Chain, while the related costs for the chain were approximately US$ 1600. The encryption analyst, Ark Invest author Lorenzo Valente, had previously estimated, on the basis of an earlier set of data, that Robinhood retained about 89 per cent of its income, that Arbitrum ecology received about 10 per cent and that the patrimony received only about 0.15 per cent.

The two sets of data differ, mainly in relation to the statistical time points, but all point to the same issue: Layer 2 ' s increased activity does not necessarily translate simultaneously into direct income from the Taipei host network.

ETH income model revisited

Critics argue that this distribution structure reduces the ability of Ethera to benefit directly from the expansion of the second layer of the network. Although more transactions may still enhance the use of ETH as a Gas, collateral and settlement asset, most user fees are left in their own system by the Layer 2 network.

According to Valente, this suggests that the Ether Workshop remains the bottom winner in terms of technology and safety, but that the value of the infrastructure it provides is not adequately reflected in the commercial pricing.

Robinhod Chain uses Arbitrum technology and disseminates data to the Ether. According to the relevant authorization structure, 10 per cent of the net revenue of the protocol will flow to the Arbitrum ecology, of which 8 per cent will go to the DAO vault and 2 per cent will go to the developer support.

Currencyized stocks bring new flows.

Proponents argue that the direct handling fees of the main network alone are not sufficient to measure the long-term value of such a network to the ecology of the Taipei. Robinhod has launched Stock Tokens in more than 120 countries through Robinhod Wallet, where eligible users can trade around the clock and use these assets for decentralized applications such as lending pools and mortgage markets.

This model may bring users of traditional vouchers into the financial markets of the chain. Users may continue to use de-centreized transactions, securitization, lending services and durability contract products if they enter first from tokenized stock products related to Apple, Nvidia, etc.

However, this expansion path still depends on user demand, market liquidity and continued product openness.

Joseph Lubin, a co-founder of the Taifu, publicly defended the low-cost model of the main network. He stated that the cost of the Taifaf floor should be maintained at a low level to support wider growth.

Lubin's judgement is that in the future more companies will be deployed on the private chain of the IPO Network, the Layer 2 and so on. According to this logic, the return from the Taifaf does not necessarily come primarily from the immediate settlement of income, but rather from broader ETH needs, including Gas, collateral and pledge use, and the destruction of ETH as a result of the main web transaction.

Quick trade Quantities on line

Robinhood went online on July 1st, the Ether House Layer 2 public network based on Arbitrum, located in real-world assets, transactions and DeFi. On-line, the Uniswap, Chainlink and Morpho projects had been supported.

Previous data show that Robinwood Chain's cross-chain ETH has exceeded $70 million, with total locking value exceeding $100 million. Uniswap single-day transactions subsequently rose to about $500 million, and the network also processed millions of transactions. Early liquidity comes mainly from borrowing products and incentive-related strategies.

Additional information:Crypto.news previous statistics show that the network's early trade volume was about $570 million, while the first-day liquidity on the line was about $21.7 million. The initial level of activity was strong, but retention after a reduced level of liquidity and incentives remained to be observed.