Houdini Swap has been integrated with Terminal. The latter is a multi-chain trading platform that was acquired by pump.fun. Once the new functionality is online, the user can complete the private entry and exit payments directly at the transaction interface and reduce the open link between the source wallet and the target wallet.
But you can fund 10 wallets at once.
The collaboration also brought the Multi-Swap function of Houdini into Terminal. Only one signature by a user can recapitalize up to 10 wallets from a single source address while avoiding a clear common trajectories on the chain.
Houdini describes this function as a tool for traders to manage different strategic accounts, with emphasis on reducing inter-account traceability. For users with frequent warehousing, sub-account operations, such features reduce the ability of external observers to track warehouse changes and trade paths.
Platform emphasizes protection of trade strategies
The chain is naturally open, allowing outside users to view wallet balances, track transfer records and analyse transactions accordingly. Both Terminal and Houdini positioned this integration as a private level upgrade rather than simply adding a new transfer point.
The CEO of SOL Stratages, Michael Hubbard, stated that the application of the chain should be based on private cash and gold, not just additional options. Pump.fun and the COO Alon of Baton Corporation, the parent company behind Terminal, also stated that there was a high demand on the part of traders for this function, especially in the case of large, fast-track operations, where wallets were often publicly identified when they were paid for.
According to the disclosed information, this integration took place after SOL Strategies acquired Houdini Swap in May 2026. After the news was released, Terminal indicated that the user could fund up to 10 trade wallets at the same time.
The community's worried about how many wallets work.
However, the update triggered a clear rebound on social platforms. Some users believe that investing in privacy will make it easier for large households or anonymous participants to divide their positions into multiple wallets, thus weakening external judgement about the uptake path and the holding of the association.
Critics also mentioned that the memecoin market was a long-standing dispute over insider advantage, unfair distribution and robotic transactions. If the platform continues to reduce the visibility between wallets, it may be more difficult for ordinary traders to understand market behaviour.
In response to the challenge, Houdini stated in a number of responses that this function was designed to protect the trade strategy and was not designed to accompany centralized delivery or concerted behaviour. The company emphasized that the goal was to protect trading advantages rather than to enlarge the operating space that was unfavourable to the diaspora.
Debate extends to memecoin market structure
The discussion also coincided with broader memecoin reflections. Recently, Ryan Watkins, a co-founder of Syncracy Capital, indicated that insider trading, bagging and automated robots had pushed the last wave of memecoin to the end. At the same time, Solana traders, and the co-founder of Bullpen Ansem, argued that the problem of packing should be reduced through more transparent currency distribution.
In cooperation with Terminal, Houdini actually put an old question back on the table: whether the chain market should place more emphasis on user privacy or on transparency in transactions. Such differences around privacy protection and market visibility are expected to continue as transaction infrastructure continues to upgrade.