The chain investigator, ZachXBT, indicated that a new encrypted fraud help site was being prepared and that victims ' requests would be handled more selectively in the future. According to them, users in the United Kingdom, India, Canada, Nigeria, as well as Morocco, Algeria and Bangladesh, may be constrained in the new system.
The new website will screen for help requests
ZachXBT wrote in Telegram that the new website would not receive all cases as in the past, but would give priority to areas where local law enforcement was more willing to respond and more likely to act on chain evidence.
He attributed this decision to his past experience in handling currency theft cases. According to him, law enforcement agencies in some areas were unable to assist victims to recover funds in a timely manner, even if they received more complete leads.
Canada and India
In his formulation, Canada was the most criticized. He claimed that he had provided more detailed information on suspects to the relevant authorities, but that the victims had still not received sufficient assistance; he also described Toronto as one of the high places of fraud.
In the case of India, he referred to several types of experience, including requests by law enforcement officials for assistance with the freezing of funds and, in individual cases, the existence of a mailbox trail of attempts to unfreeze funds associated with Lazarus Group. He also claims that the Indian side mistakenly identified a fishing website as a formal platform and arrested the founder of the exchange accordingly.
Differences in community perceptions
In addition to Canada and India, ZachXBT has included the United Kingdom and Nigeria on the list of less experienced jurisdictions. In the case of Morocco and Algeria, his wording was more intense and directly criticized the local Government ' s ability to deal with related issues.
However, these statements are drawn from the personal statements of ZachXBT, based mainly on his alleged involvement in the case and not on the independent findings of the overall law enforcement system of the State concerned.
Following the release of the plan, proponents felt that investigators should invest time in cases where law enforcement cooperation was more likely to be obtained to improve the efficiency of recovery. Opposition voices also pointed out that limiting access by country or region could deprive some victims of access because of their location.