According to the media, the focus of the latest discussion around Pi Network was on the token unlocking arrangements in the second half of 2026. According to one encrypted market analyst, the continued release of additional traffic may put additional pressure on prices, and the project has not yet responded publicly to such claims.
Unlocking close to 776 million in the second half of the year.
The article quotes an analyst, Dr Altcoin, who states that between now and December 2026, approximately 775.8 million Pi tokens are expected to be unlocked, or approximately 129.3 million per month. It is judged that the token for the partial closure of the lockout may flow to the trading platform, thus increasing the pressure on sales.
Such concerns relate mainly to the three-year lockout expiry of an early user. As the locking of tokens gradually enters circulation, the ability of markets to absorb new supplies has become a focus of external attention.
Focus on supply and demand and mobility
According to the analysis, a single announcement, ecological renewal or new exchanges are not necessarily sufficient to stabilize prices. The core issue remains the matching of supply releases, market demand and transaction liquidity.
The article mentions that the views call for Pi Core Team to respond positively to market questions about supply and demand structures and to discuss possible approaches with the community. To date, project participants have not responded publicly to these specific statements.
The analysts made three ideas.
- Destruction of part of the remaining token supply
- Increased number of large exchanges online Pi
- Establish verifiable buy-back and destruction mechanisms
The article also mentions that, if the price falls by 0.01 dollars, Pi may lose the location of 100 encrypted assets before the market value. Analysts have also argued that if prices are weak in the long term, there may be greater pressure at the operational level of the project.
Additional information:At present, these judgements are still based primarily on the analysis of single market persons, and there are no independent data or official statements confirming the conclusions.
