OpenAI's public chat e-mail evidence back against Apple's commercial secrets

In July, Apple formally charged OpenAI with stealing business secrets from former Apple employees, claiming that the outgoing engineer Liu Xian, Senior Manager Downan had taken the in-house confidential materials, that the OpenAI interview was deliberately designed to extract apple-specific hardware secrets and that management had acquiesced in the violations. On Tuesday, local time, OpenAI published an official blog to counter the lawsuit in its entirety, stating that Apple's prosecution was hasty, subjective, and that key evidence, such as e-mails, employee chat records, had been made public, and that the Apple's core claim had been overturned. The communication record is a false story: Apple claims to have actively contacted OpenAI in February without a response to the leaks, and to have been met by the two law enforcement officials; it is true that Apple's outside lawyer mismailed the Asian family name and never produced an effective communication; the so-called legal communication is a false statement. The core breach charges were overturned: Apple found that former engineer Liu Xian had been actively dislodging confidential information to OpenAI, a chat record showing that Apple’s active employee had contacted Liu Xian after he had left office, demanded project documents and technical support, and not that Liu Xian had taken the initiative to steal the leak, and OpenAI claimed that the problem arose from Apple’s rights management gaps。